Cases 121 - 130 of 889
Iden v. Chase Bank
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Richard Iden
Defendant:
Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COULIBALY v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA et al
as 1:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
TIEMOKO COULIBALY
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE), NRT MID ATLANTIC TITLE SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burchfield v. Alibaba Group et al
as 1:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Burchfield
Defendant:
Alibaba Group, Jack Ma, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamal Soloman v. Alex Villanueva
as 2:2021cv07722
Plaintiff:
Gamal Soloman
Defendant:
Alex Villenueva, Donald Steele, Jeff Prang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis v. Evans et al
as 6:2022cv06234
Plaintiff:
Alexander J. Curtis
Defendant:
Malik Evans, Ofc. Flint, Todd Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson, Jr v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 2:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Lowell Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Leandro Guillen, Joya Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2022cv01849
Plaintiff:
Oleta Moore, Larella Moore and Kimberley Moore
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-820
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Jemison v. IL Dept of Health
as 22-20114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
George Jemison
Defendant / Appellee:
Illinois Department of Health and Family Services, Illinois Secretary of State, Comptroller State of Illinois and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
