Cases 131 - 139 of 139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv14129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-4002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Salinas v. AT&T CORPORATION
as 4:2007cv01952
Defendant:
AT&T CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
Luis Salinas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10436
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hepting, et al v. AT&T Corporation, et al
as 06-17132
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, GREGORY HICKS, ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AT&T CORPORATION
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Defendant-intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicu:
SUSAN FREIWALD, Amici Law Professor, THE CENTER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES, THE CALIFORNIA FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae:
ROBERT M. CHESNEY, UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
