Cases 11 - 20 of 937
Rocha v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv04774
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rocha
Defendant:
Jimmie Jones-Newton, Jewel Bailey and Tara K Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04952
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04990
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Shanae Dillihunt v. Moneygram et al
as 2:2024cv05913
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less, Marinas Linens Wholesale, Shoe Palace and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kyle Jones et al v. City of Ontario
as 5:2024cv01270
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 inclusive and City of Ontario
Plaintiff:
Crystal Jones and Kyle Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
Leron Jones
Defendant:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Michael Kors et al
as 2:2024cv05789
Defendant:
Michael Allen Jones, Mike Jones, Michael Kors and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chan et al v. Stefanski et al
as 3:2024cv03631
Plaintiff:
Amanda Jones, Gabriel Chan, Stefan Ascierto and others
Defendant:
Robert Sinnott, City of San Rafael and John Stefanski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jones v. City of Vallejo et al
as 2:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Bryson Jones
Defendant:
City of Vallejo and Matthew Komoda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
