Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Polinski v. Oneida County Sheriff et al
as 6:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Peter Joseph Polinski
Defendant:
Oneida County Sheriff, Comptroller of City of Utica, KeyBank of the City of Utica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shalom et al v. City of Utica
as 6:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Beit Shalom and Stephen Galiley
Defendant:
City of Utica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendricks v. City of Utica Criminal Court et al
as 6:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
Danielle C. Hendricks
Defendant:
City of Utica Criminal Court, Judge Sabb, Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. City of Utica, New York
as 22-2849
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Peter Morgan
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Utica, New York
Morgan v. City of Utica
as 6:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morgan
Defendant:
City of Utica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Williams et al
as 6:2022cv00982
Plaintiff:
Sheila Robinson
Defendant:
Mark Williams, Kyle Piersall, John De Traglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Morgan v. City of Utica, New York
as 6:2020cv01424
Defendant:
City of Utica, New York
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City of Utica et al
as 6:2020cv01340
Defendant:
Police Officer John P. Detraglia, Sergeant Goldstein, City of Utica and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00539
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
