Cases 11 - 20 of 5,980
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 er Removal- Employment Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04762
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Higgins Family Trust v. Haaland et al
as 2:2024cv01664
Defendant:
Kevin McMahill, David Rhodes, Timothy Patrick Brislin and others
Plaintiff:
Higgins Family Trust
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06751
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
McGagh v. Baltimore County State's Attorney et al
as 1:2024cv02533
Defendant:
Does 1-25 Inclusive, Daniel Jawor, Lawrence Heller and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Campbell McGagh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
McGagh v. Fader et al
as 1:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Karen Campbell McGagh
Defendant:
Brynja Booth, DOES 1-25 inclusive, Michele Hotten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03879
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Lewis v. Lewis, et al.
as 4:2024cv00773
Defendant:
Karen Lewis, Richard Scott Woodruff, MCKINNEY 380 TD2, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
