Cases 11 - 20 of 709
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Davis v. Crime Stoppers PA et al
as 1:2024cv00984
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, PA State Police, Crime Watch PA and others
Plaintiff:
Rafiyq Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PODLUCKY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Gregory Joseph Podlucky
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Jones v. United States
as 1:2024cv00869
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Defendant:
Ms. Hicks, State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and others
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Lawrence Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MANAGER HILGEN, WILLIE WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, THE BUDD COMPANY, DR. MESHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
