Cases 21 - 30 of 127
Jane Doe v. James Dewees
as 23-1550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES T. DEWEES, Sheriff of Carroll County, BEN CRAFT, Deputy Sheriff, DOUGLAS KRIETE, Deputy Sheriff and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sanchala v. Community Housing Management Corp. et al
as 7:2023cv00519
Defendant:
Executive Director Tejash Sanchala, Jose Feliciano, Cindy Mauro and others
Plaintiff:
Tejash Sanchala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Sarah Thomas v. Neenah Joint School District
as 22-2527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARAH THOMAS, individually and as legal guardian of C.S., a minor child
Defendant / Appellee:
NEENAH JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
