Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vargas v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 8:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Johnny Vargas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital and United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Cuyler v. Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 8:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
James M. Cuyler
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bay Pines VA Health Care Systems, Paul Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
O'Neal v. MacDill AFB et al
as 8:2021cv02576
Plaintiff:
Tarjal LaTrois O'Neal
Defendant:
MacDill AFB, Fort Jackson Army Instillation, Department of Economic Opportunity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOWNSEND v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
HENRY WILLIS TOWNSEND, JR
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23919
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
O'Neal v. MacDill AFB et al
as 6:2021cv01850
Plaintiff:
Tarjal LaTrois O'Neal
Defendant:
MacDill AFB, Fort Jackson Army Installation, Department of Economic Opportunity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv10155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
