Cases 21 - 30 of 586
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Myles v. Walmart, et al
as 24-3038
Plaintiff:
BRACEY MYLES and ALFREDA LANG
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., DBA Walmart Supercenter #378 and WALMART DE
Myles v. Walmart, et al
as 24-3026
Plaintiff:
BRACEY MYLES and ALFREDA LANG
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., DBA Walmart Supercenter #378 and WALMART DE
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
SABRINA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, JUDGE THERESA A. BISENIUS, JUDGE JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv10080
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M Williams and Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Judge Theresa Bisenius, Judge Jennifer Ulwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lang v. Clinton et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jason William Lang
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Andrew Mark Cuomo, Barack Hussein Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brouillette v. Mobile County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
John Michael Brouillette, Sr.
Defendant:
Mobile County District Attorney's Office, Ashley Rich, Keith Blackwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
