Cases 21 - 30 of 32
LEATHERMAN v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2012cv01486
Plaintiff:
NAOMI LEATHERMAN
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, QUEST DIAGNOSTICS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROY v. USA GOVT et al
as 2:2012cv04857
Plaintiff:
KKK ROY
Defendant:
USA GOVT, PIYADI BHATSCHAPPE, M ZYSINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROY v. SUPREME COURT OF U.S. et al
as 2:2012cv04152
Plaintiff:
KAMAL K.K. ROY
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF U.S., J. ROBERT, B OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PERALES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and DANIEL KEN "DAN&q INOUYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. PENTAGON, U.S. SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA et. al.
as 2:2011cv05562
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pavalone v. Bush et al
as 3:2011cv01620
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Pavalone
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Barack Obama, William Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MACKAY v. OBAMA
as 2:2011cv05458
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRANCIS MACKAY, JR
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONJURE UP ENTERTAINMENT et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICAN et al
as 2:2011cv02520
Plaintiff:
CONJURE UP ENTERTAINMENT and ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICAN, UNITED STATE DISTRICT NJ, COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FORD v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2011cv02365
Plaintiff:
JASON PHILLIP FORD
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, ERIC HOLDER, NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2010cv03456
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, MICHAEL BERNARD MUKASEY, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
