Cases 31 - 40 of 1,438
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Benshoof v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2024cv00808
Defendant:
J Doe, Jessica Skelton, Marshall Ferguson and others
Interested Party:
Howard Brown
Plaintiff:
Kurt Benshoof
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dannan v. City of Yakima et al
as 1:2024cv03111
Defendant:
City of Yakima, Yakima Police Department and John and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Dominic Dannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley et al v. City of Spokane et al
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
R.Par.B., R.Pat.B., Keshia Hahn and others
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-40, Christopher Johnson, City of Spokane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00724
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00748
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moquete v. GNC Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05393
Defendant:
GNC Holdings LLC and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Lea Moquete
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00998
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
