Cases 31 - 40 of 8,791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01602
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dudley v. Martin et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Y. Dudley
Defendant:
Hon. David S. Martin, Kevin Brewer, Premier Properties, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07656
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reiner v. Guerrero et al
as 4:2024cv05515
Defendant:
Anik Banerjee, Kirsten Galler, Rita Himes and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Reiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonoplos v. St. Martin of Tours Catholic Church et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00529
Defendant:
Christopher Boutin, St. Martin of Tours Catholic Church and Julie Vanbuskirk
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Gadiel Antonoplos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strong v. 99 Randall Avenue Owners Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv05782
Defendant:
Martin Feinman, Eric Harnisen, Topper Realty Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Rios v. Martin et al
as 1:2024cv01399
Defendant:
Hanover Borough, Pennsylvania and Chad E. Martin
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin et al v. Biolife Plasma Services LP
as 3:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Douglas Martin and Jonathon Mough
Defendant:
Biolife Plasma Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
