Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Shelton v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv04786
Plaintiff:
Calvin Shelton and James Moore
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Undercover # 39 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Hairston et al
as 1:2015cv02764
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smith
Defendant:
Jamel Hairston, Christopher Heredia, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. MacKenzie et al
as 1:2015cv02766
Plaintiff:
Modon Curry
Defendant:
Angus MacKenzie, Undercover Number 39 and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv01327
Plaintiff:
Richard Cruz
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Oscar Fernandez and Under Cover Officer #39
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOLIVER v. BROAD RIPPLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2014cv01840
Defendant:
BROAD RIPPLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INDIANAPOLIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TOLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Diaz v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05126
Plaintiff:
Johnny Diaz
Defendant:
The City of New York, Tyrone Biruet, Undercover Officer #C0243 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maclin v. Adult Protective Services et al
as 1:2014cv01074
Plaintiff:
Mario L. Maclin
Defendant:
Adult Protective Services, Carla Duncan, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heizer v. California Department of Developmental Services et al
as 2:2014cv00458
Plaintiff:
Dale Heizer
Defendant:
California Department of Developmental Services, Terri Delgadillo, Malayna Babb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
