Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Delima v. Seyfarth Shaw Attorney's at Law
as 1:2011cv10655
Plaintiff:
Natasha Delima
Defendant:
Seyfarth Shaw Attorney's at Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ferent v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv11791
Plaintiff:
Alphonse R. Ferent
Defendant:
United States of America, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Five Law Firms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv11693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2007cv30169
Plaintiff:
Donald B. James
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Hampden County, Robert S. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Boston, City of et al
as 1:1973cv00269
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Boston Branch of the NAACP
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Human Resources Division
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Massachusetts Association of Minority Law Enforcement Officers and Boston Society of Vulcans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
