Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Callwood et al v. City of Kingston et al
as 1:2015cv01298
Plaintiff:
Angie Callwood and Johnathon Hardaway
Defendant:
City of Kingston, Michael Mills, Robert Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Donaldson v. HHS, et al
as 15-2252
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK P. DONALDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, MIKE ZIMMER, in his official capacity as Executive Director of Mich. Administrative Hearing System and others
McClain v. Strand et al
as 2:2015cv02009
Plaintiff:
Donnelle McClain
Defendant:
Mary J Strand, Tracy C Morgan, Akira R Arakawa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Kobishop v. Brey et al
as 1:2015cv01077
Plaintiff:
Jerome W Kobishop
Defendant:
Alan Brey, David Miron, Francis Boil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Strand v. Town of Merrillville et al
as 2:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Craig Strand
Defendant:
Town of Merrillville and Curtis Minchuk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRAND v. STEWARD et al
as 2:2015cv00817
Plaintiff:
REGAN STRAND
Defendant:
MATTHEW STEWARD, FLOYD C. LEWIS and THE CITY OF CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Donaldson v. HHS, et al
as 14-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK P. DONALDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, MIKE ZIMMER, in his official capacity as Executive Director of Mich. Administrative Hearing System and others
Urban v. Sells et al
as 5:2014cv04077
Plaintiff:
James Urban
Defendant:
John Sells, Chad Morrow, Amy Oetken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urban v. Sells et al
as 4:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
James Urban
Defendant:
John Sells, Chad Morrow, Amy Oetken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
