Cases 81 - 90 of 2,622
TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-4143
as 3:2024cv04143
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS, EDWIN MALDONADO, POLICE OFFICER SCOTT MALONEY and others
Defendant:
CIVIL DATA RESEARCH, CIVIL DATA RESEARCH, LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-04096
as 2:2024cv04096
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS, JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2 and others
Defendant:
DELVEPOINT, LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-04106
as 3:2024cv04106
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
SEARCH QUARRY, LLC, SEARCH QUARRY, INC., RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-04098
as 2:2024cv04098
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
QUANTARIUM ALLIANCE, LLC, QUANTARIUM GROUP, LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Richard Warner, et al v. City of Marathon, et al
as 24-10901
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. WARNER, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Joseph Ardolino II, JOHN W. PARENTE, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Joseph Ardolino II and JOSEPH E. ARDOLINO, individually
Defendant:
CITY OF MARATHON, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, MICHAEL CINQUE, individually and as a City of Marathon Official, RALPH LUCIGNANO, individually and as a City of Marathon Official and others
Dan Chacko v. Melissa Preston
as 24-1243
Plaintiff:
DAN CHACKO
Defendant:
MELISSA PRESTON, DAVID POWELL, JOHN R. FORD and others
Bryan Mick v. Barrett Gibbons, et al
as 24-1610
Plaintiff:
Bryan S. Mick, Personal Representative of the Estate of Print Zutavern, Deceased
Defendant:
Deputy Barrett Gibbons, in his individual and official capacities, Deputy Lawrence Stump, in his individual and official capacities, Sheriff Dan Osmond, in his individual and official capacities and others
Appellant:
Nebraska State Patrol
Randall Williams v. Charleston County Sheriff's Office
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
RANDALL WILLIAMS, Personal Representative of the Estates of Shanice R. Dantzler-Williams and Miranda R. Dantzler-Williams and BETTY SIMMONS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Stephanie Dantzler
Defendant:
EMILY PELLETIER, CLINTON SACKS, CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Johnny Miles v. City of Hazlehurst, Georgia, et al
as 24-10885
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY MILES, as Surviving Parent of Abdul Jabar Furcron, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Abdul Jabar Furcron, Deceased
Defendant:
CITY OF HAZLEHURST, GEORGIA, A municipality organized under the laws of the State of Georgia, PHILLIP A. BENNETT, Individually, and in his official capacity as a Hazlehurst Police Officer and JOSE GAULDALUPE ZAMORA, Individually, and in his official capacity as a Hazlehurst Police Officer
- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-4041
as 2:2024cv04041
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSONS, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
INFOMATICS, LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and ABC COMPANIES 1-10 FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
