Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Bob Riley, John Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCall v. New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kenyon J McCall
Defendant:
New Life Interfaith Ministries Inc, George Matthews, II, Michael B. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mayo v. The State of Alabama Department of Human Resources Child Support Enforcement Division et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2018cv00359
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
The State of Alabama Department of Human Resources Child Support Enforcement Division, Maurice A. Eggleston, Victoria Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Ingram et al (MAG+)
as 1:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Morris
Defendant:
Lori Collier Ingram, LaDonna B. Spivey and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
