Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Carter v. Forsyth County Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Defendant:
Lieutenant Thompson, Forsyth County Sheriff, Sheriff Ron Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Loyd v. Hogansville Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Defendant:
Nathan Fuller, Marcus Rakestaw, Danielle Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Loyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03437
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
RISCO v. BRAYTON et al
as 5:2024cv00196
Defendant:
SGT ANTHONY THOMPSON, SGT MICHAEL BRAYTON and SHERIFF BRAD WHITE
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO RISCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kass v. Lt. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
Hannah Kass
Defendant:
Lt. Ramirez, Officer Cory Beiermann and Det. Brian Randolph Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Graham v. Emerson et al
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Christina Ann Graham
Defendant:
Deputy Madisen Emerson, Deputy Kevin Clarke and Deputy Elvin Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
