Cases 1 - 10 of 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02370
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
v. Martinez
as 3:2024cv00276
Defendant:
John Spencer, Jacqueline Aguilera, Alonzo Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mitchell v. City of Burleson TX Municipality Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01894
Defendant:
B Cordell, Terres Poer, Autumn Keefer and others
Plaintiff:
Danny R Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Huebner et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Defendant:
Jefferson County Appeals and Writs Division, Quentin Price, Charles Keith Hawkes and others
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Thompson v. City of Van et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mary . Thompson
Defendant:
city of van, Tammy Huff, Melissa Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
