Cases 1 - 8 of 8
McCleary v. QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC et al
as 3:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Omarii McCleary
Defendant:
QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC, QCHC of Tennessee, Inc., QCHC Management Services Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson-Iveson et al v. Wilson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv01245
Plaintiff:
Sandi Jackson-Iveson and Blaine Freeman
Defendant:
Wilson County, Tennessee, Wilson County Sheriff's Department, Robert Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Headden et al v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Headden , Doug Stone , Robert Evans and others
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga , Ron Littlefield , Chattanooga Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Babel et al v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00194
Plaintiff:
Sandra F Babel , Michael Harvel , Susan S Blaine and others
Defendant:
American Traffic Solutions, Inc and Town of Bluff City, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhymer et al v. Bristol, TN, City of et al
as 2:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Allen W Rhymer, Jr and Lindsey A Rhymer
Defendant:
Bristol, TN, City of , Blaine Wade , Albert M Overbey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ward v. Still et al
as 2:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Melissa D Ward
Defendant:
Michael A Still, - Camper, - Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Love v. Bristol, TN, City of et al
as 2:2007cv00162
Plaintiff:
James R Love
Defendant:
Bristol, TN, City of, Blaine E Wade and Justin Branson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Love v. Bristol, TN, City of et al
as 2:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
James R Love and James R Love
Defendant:
Bristol, TN, City of, Blaine E Wade and - Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
