Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Michael Williams v. Vidalia Orthopedic Center LLC, et al
as 22-13014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DESHAUN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
VIDALIA ORTHOPEDIC CENTER LLC, GREGORY M. WIGGINS, WIGGINS FOOT AND ANKLE ASSOCIATES, P.C. and others
Williams v. Vidalia Orthopedic Center LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Deshaun Williams
Defendant:
Vidalia Orthopedic Center LLC, Dr. Gregory M. Wiggins, Wiggins Foot and Ankle Associates P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amun-Ra Meduty v. Georgia Dept. Admin. Svcs., et al
as 14-13939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMUN-RA HOTEP ANKH MEDUTY, Prince
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LISA PRATT, Director of Risk Management Services; individually and in her official capacity, BROADSPIRE SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012at00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meduty v. Georgia Department of Administrative Services et al
as 1:2012cv03240
Plaintiff:
Amun-Ra Hotep Ankh Meduty
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Administrative Services , Lisa Pratt , Broadspire Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
