Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MYERS v. GL SOLUTIONS GMBH & CO. KG
as 1:2023cv03619
Plaintiff:
HENRY MYERS, HENRY BARHITE and HENRY CHRIST
Defendant:
GL SOLUTIONS GMBH & CO. KG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TACCINO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv03115
Plaintiff:
VRINDER SINGH RANDHAWA, WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01765
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MYERS et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2020cv00700
Plaintiff:
BELINDA MYERS and WANDA THOMAS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY and TIFAQUR QUANTAY OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TUCKER v. PARKER et al
as 1:2017cv02706
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. TUCKER
Defendant:
CARL D. PARKER, AEAONMS, INC., CHARLES DAVENPORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2017cv00754
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BELL , JASON BROWN , LEON MYERS and others
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
MYERS v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT
as 1:2017cv00702
Plaintiff:
REGINA JOANN MYERS
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
