Cases 1 - 10 of 18
ELLIS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M. ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH DEPT., THE OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA (UE) et al
as 2:2021cv00528
Defendant:
CARL ROSEN, EUGENE ELK, UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA (UE) and others
Plaintiff:
IRENE DONNA THOMAS, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DEWDNEY v. TABAS AND ROSEN, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv02865
Plaintiff:
W. DEWDNEY
Defendant:
TABAS AND ROSEN, P.C., X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PERKINS v. MARPLE TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2014cv06942
Plaintiff:
JAMES PERKINS
Defendant:
MARPLE TOWNSHIP , MARPLE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cabrera v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
Rafael Cabrera
Defendant:
Avery Johnson, David Hodges, Jerry Kabala and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
