Cases 1 - 10 of 240
Dajani v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv01460
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Scott M. Joes doing business as Judge Scott M. Joes, Alexandre Rua doing business as Marshal Alexandre Rua and others
Plaintiff:
Alket Dajani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Chambers v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv01454
Defendant:
City of Hartford C.I. and State of Connecticut
Plaintiff:
Roy C Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
State of Connecticut v. Dajani
as 3:2024cv01357
Defendant:
Alket Dajani
Plaintiff:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00986
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pal v. Tallberg et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Neelu Pal
Defendant:
James N Tallberg, Andrew J Glass, Patrick D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antar v. Grogins et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Auden Grogins, Scott Jones, Jane Grossman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson et al v. City of New Haven et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Karen Jackson and E.F.
Defendant:
City of New Haven, City of New Haven Police Department, City of Waterbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
