Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Chambers v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00184
Defendant:
Warden Brooks C. Benton, Georgia Department of Corrections, Worthen and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Chambers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN et al v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00257
Defendant:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, Counselor williams, SERGEANT RONNESHA TULLIS and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN BROWN and DARLENE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCK et al v. SMITH et al
as 3:2024cv00058
Defendant:
JOSEPH WILLIAMS, TEADRA TOLIVER, WARDEN TAMARSHE SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
CHASTITY DAWN BUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEWART v. SAMPSON
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRYAN STEWART
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SNEAD v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
BENNIE MAE SNEAD
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN DESHAWN JONES and DOE JOHN AND JANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MAYS v. STEEDLEY
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAYS v. STEEDLEY et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS
Defendant:
WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY and CHAPLAIN ALEXANDER JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mena v. Carvajal et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ruben Mena
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Colette Peters, Warden D. Edge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WRIGHT v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wright
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, JOHN DOE, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
