Cases 1 - 10 of 6,893
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Tear v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00268
Defendant:
Christopher Asher Wray, Avril Danica Haines, Kamala Devi Harris and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Tear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Brian Kester doing business as Brian Kester, Assistant County Attorney and Amy S. Anderson doing business as Amy S. Anderson, Artical 1 Administrator
Plaintiff:
Bryan Casey Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seadler v. PACCAR Parts
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Jera Marie Seadler
Defendant:
PACCAR Parts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Vowels v. State of Kentucky et al
as 3:2024cv00439
Defendant:
Corey A, Taylor, Collin Anthony Watkins, State of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crawford v. Korzenborn et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Defendant:
Doe's 1-10, Matthew Hall and Charles L Korzenborn
Plaintiff:
Hassan Abdul Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
