Cases 131 - 140 of 1,153
VASS v. WHITTINGHAM et al
as 5:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AARON VASS and CALVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGHAM, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, ANN BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Waterstraat et al
as 3:2022cv03116
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Waterstraat, . Bowen, John Doe, 11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox v. Bowen (Warden)
as 1:2022cv02426
Petitioner:
Giovonnte Maddox
Respondent:
Tommy Bowen (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. BOWEN
as 1:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
TELVIN BOBBY KING
Respondent:
Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TRIPP v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2022cv01200
Plaintiff:
TERRY WILLIAM TRIPP, SR.
Defendant:
COLEMAN, A. TRIVETT, EADS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Bowen
as 3:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Dakarai Harmon
Respondent:
Warden Tommy Bowen and Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimmie Bowen v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-11744
Petitioner:
JIMMIE L. BOWEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Clive Patrick Bowen v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv03577
Petitioner:
Clive Patrick Bowen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rushing v. Salaman et al
as 8:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Carla L. Rushing
Defendant:
Krystal Salaman, Ashley Blue, Douglas Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAWLS v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
JULIUS RAWLS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, MEDICAL DIRECTOR ANN BOWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
