Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Guy Carlson v. Kelly Santoro
as 2:2019cv00056
Petitioner:
Guy Carlson
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Davis v. Kings County Board of Supervisors, et al.
as 1:2018cv01667
Defendant:
Carrie R. Woolley, Kings County Board of Supervisors, Kings County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camunas-Cortez v. Salazar et al
as 2:2018cv00795
Plaintiff:
Alberto Camunas-Cortez
Defendant:
J. Salazar, Carlson, Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banet v. Geo Group Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02975
Plaintiff:
Hausmann-Alain Banet
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc., George C. Zoley, Anne Newman Forman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castaneda v. CDCR et al
as 1:2016cv01562
Plaintiff:
Jesus Bonilla Castaneda
Defendant:
CDCR, James A. Yates, P. D. Pease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castaneda v. Yates et al
as 1:2016cv01524
Plaintiff:
Jesus Bonilla Castaneda
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. D. Pease, J. A. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Jason Stanley v. Aaron James Valdez et al
as 2:2016cv01872
Defendant:
Seymour Amster, Seymour Amster, Michelle Blizzard and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jason Stanley
Tymr Abdullah v. Superior Court of the State of California et al
as 5:2016cv00461
Petitioner:
Tymr Ibn Abdullah
CPOA:
California Peace Officers Assoc.
Respondent:
Bradley Carlson No. 1157, District Attorney's Office of S.B. County, Probation Dept., John Doe No. 187126 and others
Houston v. Sacramento Superior Court et al
as 2:2016cv00528
Plaintiff:
Jon Lloyd Houston
Defendant:
Sacramento Superior Court, Wen and Kate Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey Lovell Arnold v. Warden Josie Gastelo et al
as 2:2016cv01218
Plaintiff:
Corey Lovell Arnold
Defendant:
A. Carlson and Warden Josie Gastelo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
