Cases 11 - 20 of 119
Boots v. Johnson et al
as 0:2017cv03923
Plaintiff:
Bill M. Boots
Defendant:
Nathan Johnson, Kevin Carlson, Richard O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlson v. Roy
as 0:2017cv02144
Petitioner:
David R. Carlson
Respondent:
Tom Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson et al. v. Dayton et al.
as 0:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson, Similarly Situated Prisoner's at All Minnesota Correctional Facilities and Other similarly Situated Prisoner's At Rush City Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Tina Smith, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Roy et al
as 0:2016cv03137
Plaintiff:
Bobby Earl Jefferson, Jr
Defendant:
Tom Roy , Minnesota Dept. of Corrections , Chris Pawelk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2015cv04429
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Dayton , Tina Smith , Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Moser et al
as 0:2015cv03307
Plaintiff:
Shawn Jamison
Defendant:
Kevin Moser, Terry Kneizel, Laurie Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman v. Pertler et al
as 0:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
Sean Brinkman
Defendant:
Thomas Pertler, Jesse Bergland, Nicole Eggert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Ninneman et al
as 0:2014cv03458
Plaintiff:
Guy Israel Greene
Defendant:
Brian Ninneman, Jason Johnson, Tom Maciej and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Senty-Haugen et al v. Jesson et al
as 0:2014cv03405
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen, Russell John Hatton and Brandon Keith Benson
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Office of the Minnesota Attorney General et al
as 0:2014cv02929
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Lori Swanson, Aaron Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
