Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Thompson v. OBCC Clinic
as 1:2017cv06364
Defendant:
OBCC Clinic
Plaintiff:
Orday K. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv04622
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Lee
Defendant:
Otis Bantum Correctional Facility and Corizon Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Stevens et al
as 1:2017cv03249
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Lee
Defendant:
Stevens, Johnson, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosser v. Pharmacutical Company that manufactures Ambien-Sanoti-Aventis et al
as 1:2017cv00504
Plaintiff:
Derek Rosser
Defendant:
Pharmacutical Company that manufactures Ambien-Sanoti-Aventis, Doctor Name Unknown, Narco Freedom Methadone Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munoz v. Eliezer et al
as 1:2016cv06049
Plaintiff:
Carlos Munoz
Defendant:
Robenson Eliezer, Keith G. Chase, Shaun A. Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02778
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Monica Windley, Caputo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tejera v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv02309
Plaintiff:
Almonmte Tejera
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Warden M.D.C. Jane Doe, M.D.C. Deputy Warden John Doe/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barresi v. Vernon C. Bain Center Clinic Staff
as 1:2015cv09953
Plaintiff:
Marc David Barresi
Defendant:
Vernon C. Bain Center Clinic Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Zakis et al
as 9:2015cv01038
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Barker
Defendant:
Zakis, Doctor at Walsh Clinic Otolaryngology Unit and at Mohawk Correctional Facility and The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Zakis et al
as 1:2015cv06545
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Barker
Defendant:
Zakis, Doctor at Walsh Clinic Otolaryngology Unit and at Mohawk Correctional Facility and The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
