Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Pavalone v. Lackawanna County Prison et al
as 1:2011cv01444
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Pavalone
Defendant:
Lackawanna County Prison, Correctional Care Inc., Aramark Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tompkins v. County of Lackawanna, PA et al
as 1:2011cv01147
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lynn Tompkins
Defendant:
County of Lackawanna, PA, ., Lackawanna County Prison and Tina Cumber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LACKAWANNA et al
as 3:2010cv00011
Petitioner:
JERMAINE LLOYD STONE
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LACKAWANNA, BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Mecca et al
as 3:2009cv02250
Plaintiff:
Brian Richardson
Defendant:
Joe Mecca, Lackawanna County Jail, County of Lackawanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SINAWA v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2009cv00225
Petitioner:
JOSEPH RONALD SINAWA
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHAVERS v. DENCH et al
as 3:2008cv02030
Petitioner:
James D. Shavers
Respondent:
Jamie A. Dench, The District Attorney of the County of Lackawanna and Attorney General Of The State Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHAVERS v. DENCH et al
as 2:2008cv02951
Petitioner:
JAMES D. SHAVERS
Respondent:
JAMIE A. DENCH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SAID v. DONATE et al
as 2:2007cv01197
Petitioner:
MAZEN FATHI SAID
Respondent:
JANINE DONATE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
