Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Perez v. Morales et al
as 5:2015cv00341
Defendant:
Officer J. Hernandez, Det. D. Morales, Det. T. Stevenson and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodis v. Morales et al
as 1:2015cv00071
Petitioner:
Deno E. Woodis
Respondent:
D. Morales, Pam Ahlin and Andre King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Hackworth, Jr. v. G. Torres, et al
as 13-16688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HACKWORTH, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
G. TORRES, Correctional Officer, D. MORALES, Correctional Officer, M. GRIMSLEY, Correctional Officer and others
Moody Woodrow Tanksley v. Atascadero State Hospital et al
as 2:2011cv06543
Defendant:
Josph Pooko Aikens, Atascadero State Hospital, Irene Carnegie and others
Plaintiff:
Moody Woodrow Tanksley
James Alan Wrentmore v. Edmun G Brown Jr. et al
as 2:2010cv05580
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Jon D Morales
Plaintiff:
James Alan Wrentmore
Edward Furnace v. Paul Sullivan, et al
as 10-15961
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD TERRAN FURNACE
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL D. SULLIVAN, CO, D. MORALES, CO and J. SOTO, Warden, CO, sued in their official and individual capacities
Edward Furnace v. Paul Sullivan, et al
as 10-15961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD TERRAN FURNACE
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL SULLIVAN, CO, D. MORALES, CO and J. SOTO, CO, sued in their official and individual capacities
Howell v. Morales
as 1:2008cv00471
Petitioner:
Ronnie Earl Howell
Respondent:
John D. Morales
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ransom v. Martinez et al
as 1:2007cv01511
Plaintiff:
Bryan E Ransom
Defendant:
J. Martinez, Mendoza, Melo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Furnace v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2007cv04441
Plaintiff:
Edward Terran Furnace
Defendant:
Paul E. Sullivan, D. Morales and J. Soto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
