Cases 11 - 20 of 63
BROWN v. VIGO COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2020cv00184
Defendant:
KNOPP and VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ADAM BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEFENDERS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA, PA et al
as 2:2019cv05856
Defendant:
ROSSMAN DEWITT THOMPSON, JR., FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEFENDERS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA, PA, DOE 1, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GEORGE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Sollie
as 3:2019cv00325
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Billie Sollie
Plaintiff:
Daniel Tamera Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Antonelli
as 8:2019cv01344
Respondent:
Bryan Antonelli
Petitioner:
Daniel Lynn Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. Arkansas Community Correction et al
as 6:2019cv06035
Defendant:
Arkansas Community Correction, Omega Unit, Nevada County, AR and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Boone County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2019cv03024
Defendant:
Boone County, Arkansas, Sheriff Mike Moore, Jason Day and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Arkansas Community Correction et al
as 4:2019cv00221
Defendant:
Baker, Arkansas Community Correction, Omega Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00086
Petitioner:
Daniel Lynn Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Daniel Brown
as 18-6643
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL J. BROWN
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
as 3:2018cv00041
Petitioner:
DANIEL GEORGE BROWN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
