Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Steiger v. Simmons(INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00599
Defendant:
United States Probation Office, Derrick Cunningham and Marcus Simmons
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Derrick Cunningham v. L. J. Milusnic et al
as 5:2019cv01244
Defendant:
C. Swain, G Villanueva, L.J. Milusnic and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Milusnic et al
as 3:2019cv01192
Defendant:
C. Swain, L.J. Milusnic, L. O'Brien and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Thomas v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00417
Defendant:
Sonja Pritchett, Derrick Cunningham and Yvonne Robinson
Plaintiff:
Alonzo H. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv01032
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham and Wanda J. Robinson
Plaintiff:
Joe Curtis Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Giles v. Derrick Cunningham, et al
as 18-10833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL GILES
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK CUNNINGHAM, MAJOR ROBINSON, LT. ALEXANDER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00647
Plaintiff:
Samuel Giles
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham, Major Robinson, Lt. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Montgomery Police Department et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Edvin Barker
Defendant:
Montgomery Police Department, D. T. Marshall, Derrick Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Vila v. Derrick Cunningham, et al
as 17-13244
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY CURTIS VILA
Respondent - Appellee:
DERRICK CUNNINGHAM, the Sheriff of Montgomery County, Alabama, DARYL D. BAILEY, the District Attorney for the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of Alabama, STEVE WADLINGTON, the District Attorney for Conecuh County, Alabama and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
