Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Woodridge v. Cook County DOC et al
as 1:2023cv04455
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woodridge
Defendant:
Cook County DOC, G. Moore and Sean Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Bock et al
as 4:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Moore
Defendant:
Lynn Bock, Cyndi Prudden, J. Hoffmeister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Moore et al
as 1:2021cv01614
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez
Defendant:
Supervisor E. Akpore and Parole Agent G. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards #203782 v. Washington et al
as 1:2020cv00908
Plaintiff:
Michael Edwards #203782 and Simba Senghor
Defendant:
Unknown LaMontagne, G. Moore, Unknown Rutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Russell et al
as 2:2019cv05842
Defendant:
Mesa Police Department, Arizona Department of Trasnportation, Scottsdale Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Demoore T Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILES v. BALDWIN COUNTY JAIL, et al
as 5:2019cv00401
Defendant:
G MOORE, BALDWIN COUNTY JAIL and OCMULGEE DISTRICT SUPERIOR COURT CIRCUIT
Plaintiff:
SANCHEZ MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reger v. Keller et al
as 1:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Presiding Judge Dean Rucker, Landon A. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Jay Reger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chance Bolen v Moore et al
as 5:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Chance D. Bolen
Defendant:
Jo'shae Ferguson-Worley, Kelly G Moore, Jeff Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Sproul et al
as 3:2017cv05727
Petitioner:
William G Moore
Respondent:
D Sproul and Charles Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Gary Moore v. Frank Bishop
as 17-6943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT G. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK BISHOP, Warden, MEDICAL STAFF and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
