Cases 11 - 20 of 8,924
Davis v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00794
Defendant:
James Gibson, Carroll, Gooley and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Tom (Program Director at Napa State Hospital) et al
as 4:2024cv06545
Defendant:
Tom (Program Director at Napa State Hospital), Program Director Sue and Supervisor Santiago
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alford v. Fox et al
as 9:2024cv05138
Respondent:
Marcus Rhods, George Debusk Jr., William Rudderow and others
Petitioner:
Billly L. Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
(PC) Johnson v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv02524
Defendant:
J. Hart, A. Rojas, E. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill (PS) v. Arapahoe County Detention Facility
as 1:2024cv02547
Respondent:
Arapahoe County Detention Facility
Petitioner:
Darius C. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill #793484 v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00961
Defendant:
Ronald Fenner, Kristopher W. Spaulding, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan M. Hill #793484
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Kendricks Hill
Defendant:
Higgins and Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Hill
as 3:2024cv06460
Respondent:
M. Hill
Petitioner:
Susan Mae Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollis v. Hill
as 3:2024cv01643
Petitioner:
Andrew Hollis
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Jones
as 1:2024cv04136
Petitioner:
Otis L Hill, Jr
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
