Cases 11 - 20 of 589
Hastey v. Hall
as 3:2024cv00255
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Hope Leticia Hastey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hastey v. Hall
as 3:2024cv00256
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Hope Leticia Hastey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hudgins Verellen v. Matthew et al
as 8:2024cv01997
Defendant:
Jason Morrow and Christopher Matthew
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Hope Hudgins Verellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verellen v. Rosa et al
as 8:2024cv01946
Defendant:
FNU Rosa, J. DeJesus and FNU Baker
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Hope Hudgins Verellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verellen v. Hernando County Corrections
as 8:2024cv01941
Defendant:
Hernando County Corrections
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Hope Hudgins Verellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Anthony Williams v. Alonzo Thompson
as 24-6769
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF GBI, Georgia Bureau Investigation, SHERIFF CHUCK WRIGHT, UNKNOWN NAME AGENTS OF SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES PHONE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Bennett v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv03244
Defendant:
Paul Schnell and Minnesota Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Hope Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Alexander et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Louis Ray Chapman, Jr.
Defendant:
Global Experts and Outsourcing Inc., C Lipscomb, S. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudgins-Verellen v. Underwood
as 8:2024cv01620
Defendant:
Melissa Dawn Underwood
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Hope Hudgins-Verellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudgins-Verellen v. Ingersoll
as 8:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Hope Hudgins-Verellen
Defendant:
Deputy Ingersoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
