Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Pattison v. Lombardo et al.
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. LeGrand et al
as 2:2022cv01402
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, John Henley, Curtis Rigner and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Russell
as 3:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
Philip Hughes
Respondent:
Kyle Olsen and Perry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trost v. Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners et al
as 3:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Roy Trost and Daisy Lynne Meadows
Defendant:
Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners, Steve Sisolak, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00261
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, Theresa Wickham, Tara Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Albert Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deaton v LVMPD
as 2:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metro Police Department
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hugh Deaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hazel v. Russell et al
as 3:2020cv00726
Defendant:
Jason Brumfield, Mrs. Mears, Beaver and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Hazel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Donnelly et al
as 3:2020cv00645
Defendant:
Melissa Hughes, Rusty Donnelly, Brian Egerton and others
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Severns v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00407
Plaintiff:
Mark Severns
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Mr. Baca, Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Baca et al
as 3:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Stagner, M. Sullivan, D. Richard and others
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
