Cases 11 - 20 of 443
Welch et al v. Pima County Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Ferrari Welch, Reginald Buckhanon, Jr. and Humberto Chapetti
Defendant:
Pima County Adult Detention Center and Unknown Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00353
Petitioner:
Humberto Baez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Baez v. UNITED ) STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Humberto Baez
Respondent:
UNITED ) STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00363
Petitioner:
Humberto Baez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Delgado v. State of Florida
as 8:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Humberto Delgado, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angulo-Mero v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Humberto E. Angulo-Mero
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
TAVARES-PEPIN v. SOME WHITE GUY
as 1:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
Mr. Humberto Tavares- Pepin and HUMBERTO TAVARES-PEPIN
Respondent:
SOME WHITE GUY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAVARES-PEPIN v. SOME WHITE GUY
as 5:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
HUMBERTO TAVARES-PEPIN
Respondent:
SOME WHITE GUY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pacheco v. Filth et al
as 6:2023cv00751
Plaintiff:
Humberto Pacheco
Defendant:
Dana Filth, FNU Shears, Benjamin Shears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humberto Hernandez v. James Haviland
as 23-3850
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUMBERTO HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES HAVILAND, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
