Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Johnson v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2022cv03210
Petitioner:
Justin Jermaine Johnson and Justin J. Johnson
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Freeman et al
as 7:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Leon Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
A. Freeman, J. Shephard, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargasan v. MG Freesites, LTD et al
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bruce Vargasan
Defendant:
MG Freesites, LTD doing business as Pornhub.com, Mindgeek USA, Inc., Briget Renee Aussin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marlon Johnson v. Travis Cathers
as 22-5246
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARLON JERMAINE JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
TRAVIS CATHERS, Sergeant
Jermaine Johnson v. C. Rodriguez
as 2:2021cv07121
Petitioner:
Jermaine Johnson
Respondent:
C. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2021cv00037
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Petitioner:
Leon Jermaine Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Thorpe et al
as 4:2020cv00149
Defendant:
Jason Woosley, Ms. Kim, Kevin Lodgson and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Jermaine Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. The State of Kentucky et al
as 6:2019cv00290
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Marilyn, The State of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Jermaine Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Kentucky et al
as 6:2019cv00258
Respondent:
Seargant Cathers, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jason Moesley and others
Petitioner:
Marlon Jermaine Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv03313
Defendant:
COFFEE, PRETORIUS, KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JERMAINE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
