Cases 11 - 20 of 250
MYERS v. BRATWAITHE et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
JARMAL LAMAR MYERS
Defendant:
STEPHANIE BRATWAITHE, PHILLIP TOLMAN, MICHAEL L. SWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02004
Petitioner:
Jabon Phillip Johnson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Elis et al
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Phillip Eugene Thomas
Defendant:
FNU Elis, Albemarle Correctional Institution and County Sheriff Offices
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Priest
as 5:2023hc02273
Petitioner:
William Stevenson Phillips
Respondent:
Pazavar Priest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILKERSON v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WILKERSON
Defendant:
DARYL JACKSON and DANNY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Buffaloe et al
as 1:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Eddie Buffaloe, Jr., Mike Slagle, Dexter Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant:
MR. DICKERSON and MR. PHILLIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wagner et al
as 5:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Wagner, FNU Smith, FNU Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
