Cases 11 - 20 of 60
WATTLETON v. PETERS
as 1:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
COLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00738
Not Classified By Court:
COLETTE S. PETERS
Plaintiff:
DIJON DIXON
Defendant:
EUGENE BAINE, J.C. PETRUCCI, MICHAEL FRAZIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HUERTA v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE GUSTAVO HUERTA
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS, MERRICK GARLAND and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
TAQUAN WRIGHT
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS, MERRICK GARLAND and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAKUBA v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
PETER GAKUBA
Respondent:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GAKUBA v. D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2023cv00458
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Petitioner:
PETER GAKUBA
Respondent:
D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARCIA v BIDEN et al.
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., BILL CLINTON, BETH GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAKUBA v. D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
PETER GAKUBA
Respondent:
D.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SERPA-CANDELARIA v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
JUAN SERPA-CANDELARIA
Defendant:
COLETES PETERS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEYS v. PETERS
as 1:2022cv03317
Petitioner:
CLAY C. KEYS
Respondent:
COLLETE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
