Cases 11 - 20 of 106
SISSON v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
IVY R. SISSON
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, BAKER and JAMES MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivy Sisson v. Gowdy, et al
as 22-3147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVY R. SISSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJOR GOWDY, MAJOR BAKER, MARION COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Munn v. Bates et al
as 3:2022cv02595
Plaintiff:
Lester J Munn and Lester Joe Munn
Defendant:
Michael Bates, Jimmy Sisson and Sandra Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISSON v. FORESTAL
as 1:2022cv01725
Petitioner:
IVY R. SISSON
Respondent:
KERRY J. FORESTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barry James Samples v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv05596
Plaintiff:
Barry James Samples
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California State Prison, Los Angeles County, Medical Staff of CSP-LAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dittoe v. Colleir et al
as 4:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
John Dittoe
Defendant:
Bryan Colleir, Elbert Holems, Jimmy Sisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burley #502426 v. Weller et al
as 1:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Edward Donald Burley #502426
Defendant:
D. Weller, Unknown Nalley, Unknown Clouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sisson v. Potchen
as 3:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Donald R Sisson
Defendant:
Potchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sisson v. Potchen
as 1:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Donald R Sisson
Defendant:
Potchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISSON v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
IVY R. SISSON
Defendant:
JOHN LAYTON, GOWDY, BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
