Cases 11 - 20 of 114
WILLIAMS v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24731
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, DEBRA PERRY, T BOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Charles v. P.A. Dittman, et al
as 23-13775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MACK CHARLES
Defendant / Appellee:
P.A. DITTMAN, S. CARROLL, OKALOOSA CI WARDEN and others
CAMPBELL v. DIXON et al
as 5:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, T BOWDEN, A KEATON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Keys et al
as 6:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Chaplain Teddy Keys, Assistant Warden Charles Driggers, Secretary Department Of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. INCH et al
as 4:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
TYRON DEBARON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MARK INCH, Z CULPEPPER, T BOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENDRICKS v. SANTANA et al
as 4:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
SILAS KENDRICKS
Defendant:
L SANTANA, T BOWDEN and A JOHNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAKOTA PHILLIPS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, GARY HEWETT, M CUMERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gyden v. Dixson et al
as 8:2022cv02980
Plaintiff:
Bernard E. Gyden
Defendant:
Rick Dixson, T. Bowden and Sabatier Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christensen v. Bowden et al
as 3:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Dennis Christensen
Defendant:
T. Bowden, C. Underhill, Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
