Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Artavias Edwards v. Texas Board of Pardons & Par, et al
as 16-41535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTAVIAS T. EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, ARANSAS COUNTY, SHERIFF BILL MILLS and others
Sheley v. Bernard et al
as 1:2016cv01429
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sheley
Defendant:
Dwayne Bernard, T. Edwards, John Doe Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheley v. Bernard et al
as 3:2016cv00687
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sheley
Defendant:
Dwayne Bernard, T. Edwards, John Doe Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv01188
Petitioner:
Zechary T. Edwards
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thompson v. Traylor et al
as 9:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Deloris F Traylor, Carlos W Berry, Jonathan D Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Artavias T Edwards
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Bennie J Coleman, Rebecca A Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00067
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Jayson Artinger, Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
ROGER T. EDWARDS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DEFENDER'S ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artavias Edwards v. Texas Board of Pardons & Par, et al
as 15-41588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTAVIAS T. EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, ARANSAS COUNTY, SHERIFF BILL MILLS and others
Hosmer v. Laxalt et al
as 3:2015cv00456
Defendant:
Anderson, Mr. Baca, Rene Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S. Hosmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
