Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Yaritz v. Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2022cv02042
Plaintiff:
Harold David Yaritz
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, AWA Wanchena, STW/AWA Westphal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Raurdin
as 0:2022cv01691
Petitioner:
Victor B. Perkins
Respondent:
Jared Raurdin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perkins v. Daniels et al
as 0:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
Jack Daniels and Dionne Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Eischen
as 0:2022cv01490
Petitioner:
Victor Bernard Jones
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Braun v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Nathan Christopher Braun
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Bayport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Kallis
as 0:2021cv02210
Petitioner:
Victor B. Perkins
Respondent:
Steve Kallis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perkins v. Trump, Sr. et al
as 0:2021cv01219
Respondent:
John Ashcroft, Mr. Barack Obama, Mr. William J. Clinton and others
Petitioner:
Victor B. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harvey v. Minnesota Department of Correction et al
as 0:2021cv00346
Defendant:
Centurion of Minnesota, L.L.C., Michelle Smith, Minnesota Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff:
Nigeria Lee Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States of America
as 0:2021cv00168
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Victor Bernard Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hageman v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2020cv02257
Defendant:
CPD Quist, CPD Scott, Safety Director Karels and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hageman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
