Cases 21 - 30 of 398
(PC) Allen v. Price et al
as 1:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
George N. Allen
Defendant:
Brandon Price, Darryl Barallon, Javier Vitela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Pollard et al
as 3:2022cv01709
Plaintiff:
Abel J. Garcia
Defendant:
M. Pollard, M. Carrillo, Y. Abdi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Trent Scentail Smith v. Carter
as 2:2022cv07780
Petitioner:
Trent Scentail Smith
Respondent:
Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Neill v. Department of State Hospitals et al
as 1:2022cv01010
Plaintiff:
Patrick Michael Neill
Defendant:
Department of State Hospitals, Stephanie Clendenin, Brandon Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Darwin Carter v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv05284
Petitioner:
Gregory Darwin Carter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jimmie L Carter v. Connie Gipson
as 2:2022cv04775
Petitioner:
Jimmie L. Carter
Respondent:
Connie Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Carter v. D. Samuels
as 2:2022cv04055
Petitioner:
John Carter
Respondent:
D. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith R. Carter v. Ron Broomfield
as 2:2022cv01256
Petitioner:
Keith R. Carter
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Carter v. Murphy et al
as 2:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Nathanael James Carter, Jr. and Nathanael James Carter, Jr
Defendant:
D. Murphy, CSP-Sacramento and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv00882
Petitioner:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Respondent:
Monteray County Dist Meagan Carter and Judge Lavorato Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
