Cases 21 - 30 of 210
Villagrana v. Loving et al
as 3:2021cv00836
Plaintiff:
Abel Alejandro Villagrana
Defendant:
Kimisha Loving, Mr. (f/n/u) Madu, Mr. (f/n/u) Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Perry et al
as 1:2021cv00067
Plaintiff:
Randy Williams
Defendant:
Grady Perry, (f/n/u) Carter, (f/n/u) Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stapp v. Elizabethton Police Dept. et al
as 2:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. STAPP and Timothy D Stapp
Defendant:
ELIZABETHTON POLICE DEPT., Carter County Sheriff's Office, E.P.D. SGT. CURTIS L. BULLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy v. Carter County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2021cv00145
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Lacy
Defendant:
Carter County Sheriffs Office, James Parrish, Mike Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Mays et al
as 3:2021cv00666
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Jones
Defendant:
Tony Mays, Ernest Lewis, George Firestine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Watts et al
as 4:2021cv00037
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Allen
Defendant:
Deputy Jakub Watts, Vanburen County Jail/Lockup, Eddie Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Slatery
as 3:2021cv00603
Petitioner:
Timothy Damon Carter
Respondent:
Herbert H. Slatery, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Watts et al
as 3:2021cv00572
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Allen
Defendant:
Deputy Jakub Watts, Vanburen County Jail/Lockup, Sheriff Eddie Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00127
Defendant:
Cpl. Wialliam Mosley, Sgt. Smith, Nurse Carmen and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. General Sessions Court Division 9 et al
as 2:2021cv02160
Defendant:
Bob Carter and General Sessions Court Division 9
Plaintiff:
Earl Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
