Cases 21 - 30 of 278
Hoskins v. Dutcher et al
as 6:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kennie Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert Dutcher, Matthew Halcomb, Erica Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Gomez et al
as 6:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Bradley, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Brandon Perry, Patti Ann Land and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boswell v. USA et al
as 7:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Jared Boswell
Defendant:
USA, Lieutenant Kevin C. Pearce, Jr., Clinton L. Pauley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Doe v. Boyce et al
as 0:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Todd Boyce, Head Chaplin Todd Boyce, James David Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willhite v. Pennington et al
as 6:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Sarrah Denton Willhite
Defendant:
Hannah Pennington, Tyler Pennington, Sgt Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Mills et al
as 3:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Shileka P. Hill
Defendant:
Shift Command Mills, Officer Quinnett, Officer Mondeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Mills et al
as 5:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Shileka P. Hill
Defendant:
Shift Command Mills, Officer Quinnett, Officer Mondeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Pauley et al
as 7:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Steven Stanley
Defendant:
Clint Pauley and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
O'Boyle v. Madison County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Amie O'Boyle
Defendant:
Madison County, Kentucky, Steve Tussey, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Officer Bray et al
as 5:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Troy Gardner
Defendant:
Officer Bray and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
