Cases 21 - 30 of 2,788
AMOS v. BOBBITT et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Defendant:
WARDEN TREVONZA BOBBITT, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE, WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE AMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snell-Jones v. G.D.C. et al
as 6:2024cv00034
Defendant:
D.W. Thomas, Co. Ms. C., Buford and others
Plaintiff:
Zion Snell-Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L HAMILTON
Defendant:
VONTERIA SMITH, DEPUTY WARDEN NICHOLAS BROWN, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Evans Memorial Hospital et al
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Defendant:
Evans Memorial Hospital and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DECATUR COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
HAROLD UNYULA SMITH, SR
Defendant:
WARDEN GORDON SCREEN, JR, DECATUR COUNTY PRISON and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
INMATE GOON, SKINNY, SGT MYERS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adan v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02432
Petitioner:
Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Defendant:
John Doe (2), John Doe (3), John Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Adams et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Defendant:
Doctor Marla Rylee, McFarland, Doctor at Evans Memorial and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. DOE et al
as 5:2024cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
TYRONE WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
